Skip to main content
 

Man's Best Friend?

Using Animal Bones to Solve an Archaeological Mystery


 

Abstract

In this case, students learn how archaeology operates as an historical science by collecting and analyzing material evidence to make claims about the past. Assuming the role of zooarchaeologists, they evaluate a hypothetical case in which “Dr. Jasper Eraillure” shocks the world by claiming a canid skull he has found at a Neanderthal site is actually that of a domestic dog. Students analyze modern skulls from wild and domestic canids, and develop a set of criteria for determining whether the “unknown” canid skull belonged to a domestic dog. They further explore the reasons behind the divergence between wild and domestic dog populations and evaluate the potential impact of Dr. Eraillure’s assertions on our understanding of the past. The case was designed for an introductory course in archaeology, but could be adapted for use in an introductory biology course.

   

Date Posted

07/22/08

Overview

Objectives

  • Make logical arguments linking present-day observations on objects to past behaviors.
  • Understand the definition of domestication and the difference between captive and domestic animals.
  • Learn skull anatomy and technical terminology by applying these to the case.
  • Be able to differentiate between observations and interpretations.
  • Practice making primary observations on archaeologically observable phenomena.
  • Be able to make distinctions between phenotype and genotype.

Keywords

Canids; domestic dogs; domestication; canine evolution; phenotype; genotype; cranial anatomy; skull; zooarchaeology, material evidence

  

Subject Headings

Evolutionary Biology
Paleontology
Anthropology
Zoology

EDUCATIONAL LEVEL

High school, Undergraduate lower division, Undergraduate upper division

  

FORMAT

PDF

   

TOPICAL AREAS

N/A

   

LANGUAGE

English

   

TYPE/METHODS

Interrupted

 

 

Asset 2