Skip to main content
 

Health Wise: Too Many Teens Have High Cholesterol

By sstuckey

Posted on 2016-11-18

blog-image

About one in five U.S. kids and teens ages 6 to 19 has abnormal cholesterol levels, according to the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS 2015). And among the 16-to-19 age group, the number rises to more than one in four.

“[This] is concerning because high cholesterol levels are a major factor contributing to heart disease and stroke,” says Mary Lou Gavin, MD, a pediatrician specializing in weight management and senior medical editor at KidsHealth.org. “Research shows that cardiovascular disease has its roots in childhood.”

Cholesterol is a lipid, or fat. The body uses cholesterol to help digest fatty foods and form cell membranes and hormones (progestagens, glucocorticoids, mineralocorticoids, androgens, and estrogens). The liver produces about 1,000 mg of cholesterol daily, which is enough for healthy functioning. Fruit, vegetables, and grains don’t have any cholesterol. Dietary cholesterol comes from:

  • dairy products (e.g., milk, cheese, and ice cream),
  • egg yolks,
  • meat,
  • poultry, and
  • seafood.

To travel through the bloodstream, cholesterol has to combine with proteins. The combination of cholesterol and proteins is called lipoproteins. Low-density lipoproteins (LDL), or “bad cholesterol,” are the primary cholesterol carriers. Too much LDL in the bloodstream can build up inside blood vessels. The buildup forms plaque—a hard substance that can cause blood vessels to become stiffer, narrower, and blocked. Plaque makes it easier for blood clots to form. A blood clot can cause a heart attack or stroke.

High-density lipoproteins (HDL), or “good cholesterol,” on the other hand, carry cholesterol away from the arteries and back to the liver, where it’s processed and sent out of the body. HDLs might even help remove cholesterol from areas of plaque. High levels of LDL increase heart disease and stroke risks. High levels of HDL can help protect the circulatory system. Here’s a mnemonic to remember good versus bad cholesterol: LDL starts with “l” for “lousy”; HDL starts with “h” for “healthy.”

Total cholesterol, based primarily on levels of LDL and HDL cholesterol, is a measure of the total amount of cholesterol in the blood. The combination of high levels of LDL and low levels of HDL indicates an increased risk of heart attack and stroke.


According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC 2015), desirable cholesterol levels for adults are:

  • LDL = less than 100 mg/dl
  • HDL = 60 mg/dl or higher
  • Total cholesterol = less than 200 mg/dl

According to Gavin, desirable levels for kids and teens are:

  • LDL = less than 110 mg/dl
  • HDL = 40 mg/dl or higher
  • Total cholesterol = less than 170 mg/dl

Factors that can contribute to high cholesterol levels include:

  • eating foods high in fats, especially saturated and trans fats;
  • having a parent with high cholesterol;
  • being obese, related to diet and exercise; and
  • having diabetes.

The study by the NCHS shows that teens ages 16 to 19 were most likely to have high total cholesterol, high LDL, or low HDL (26.9% for ages 16 to 19 versus 21.0% for ages 6 to 19 overall). This is why your students should know about:

  • the need for screening to learn their cholesterol levels and
  • how a healthy diet and daily exercise can help improve cholesterol levels.

Classroom activity
Ask your students to write an essay addressing the following question: The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends (AAP 2011) that all children be screened for high cholesterol at least once between ages 9 and 11 years and between ages 17 and 21 years. Why? Resources cited below are appropriate for their research.

Michael E. Bratsis (mbratsis@kidshealth.org) is senior editor for Kids Health in the Classroom (kidshealth.org/classroom). Send comments, questions or suggestions to mbratsis@kidshealth.org.

On the web
Article, video, quiz for students: http://teenshealth.org/en/teens/cholesterol.html, http://bit.ly/lipo-science-vid, http://bit.ly/cholesterol-quiz

References
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). 2011. Physicians recommend all children, ages 9–11, be screened for cholesterol. http://bit.ly/2cgI1mQ
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2015. Cholesterol fact sheet. http://bit.ly/1pz0zxh
National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). 2015. Abnormal cholesterol among children and adolescents in the United States, 2011–2014 http://bit.ly/cholesterol-kids

Editor’s Note

This article was originally published in the November 2016 issue of The tst_nov16_covScience Teacher journal from the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA).

Get Involved With NSTA!

Join NSTA today and receive The Science Teacher,
the peer-reviewed journal just for high school teachers; to write for the journal, see our Author GuidelinesCall for Papers, and annotated sample manuscript; connect on the high school level science teaching list (members can sign up on the list server); or consider joining your peers at future NSTA conferences.

blog-image

About one in five U.S. kids and teens ages 6 to 19 has abnormal cholesterol levels, according to the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS 2015). And among the 16-to-19 age group, the number rises to more than one in four.

 

The Mixed Blessings of Substitute Teachers

By Lynn Petrinjak

Posted on 2016-11-17

How often each year does a substitute typically teach your classes? 0.5%=Never. 23.9% Once or Twice. 46.8% Three to Four Times. 28.6% Five or More Times.

Like all educators, science teachers rely on substitutes to lead their classrooms when they have to take a day (or more) of leave. In a recent anonymous NSTA Reports poll, 46.8% of participants reported needing a substitute for their classroom three or four times a year, with 28.6% reporting they depend on substitutes five or more times annually and 23.9% only once or twice a year. All reported leaving lesson plans for substitutes ahead of a planned absence, and 75% report maintaining “emergency” lesson plans for an unplanned absence. Most (77%) report that substitutes usually followed the plans.

Do the substitutes usually follow lesson plans? 23%=No. 77%=Yes.

Nearly 87% say they take steps to prepare their classrooms for a substitute ahead of a planned absence. Educators say they leave seating charts, set up labs, check the room’s organization, “label everything,” lock up all lab equipment, or “hide materials that may be stolen or damaged.” Eighty-four percent reported preparing their students for a substitute: many by reviewing class rules, expectations, and agendas.

 

Few (8%) report substitutes typically have a background in the subject matter, and a majority (65%) don’t get to approve or screen the substitutes that will teach their classes.



Would you like to take part in our anonymous poll on on how educators respond when student experiments have unexpected results or educators’ experiences polling students about their classes?



Here’s what science educators are saying about the challenges of having a substitute:

Having them teach new content is scary, especially since each class coming in that day has its own atmosphere for learning. I’m afraid things will not be taught with the same passion that I teach them with.—Educator, High School, Indiana

You can’t leave a lesson and expect it to be taught, but at the same time, it’s hard to give up valuable teaching time.—Educator, Elementary, Washington, D.C.

Abuse and neglect of my workspace [has occurred].—Educator, Middle School, Maryland

When the substitutes I trust are not available and I have to just put the job out there for any sub to grab, I get worried that I’ll get the sub who sits on [his or her] phone all day and doesn’t follow the plans/help.—Educator, Middle School, Michigan

Unknown background [of the sub is typical]. I must leave a boring lesson. Something anyone can do…I can’t have students do an activity because I don’t know the background of the teacher. I use lots of technology in my lessons, but I can’t leave the same type [of lesson] for a sub.—Educator, Middle School, California

You aren’t entirely sure if students are getting what they need out of a lesson. Also, you can’t be 100% sure the lesson will actually get completed.—Educator, Middle School, Connecticut

Having the material correctly taught [isn’t guaranteed].—Educator, Middle School, New Jersey

They do not have a background in science. And I am not able to have labs or activities planned when I am absent.—Educator, High School, Kansas

I cannot expect them to teach science because they do not have the training and expertise to conduct activities with an awareness of health and safety in the science classroom.—Educator, Elementary, Wisconsin

[It’s unknown w]hether or not we will actually have a dedicated sub or if there will be other teachers covering a particular class. I could have six different people monitor my classes. There are times that one class may be covered, but others will end up in the auditorium with several other uncovered classes and nothing academic is able to take place.—Educator, High School, New Jersey

Having to skip labs or adjust activities when I can’t get a sub with science background.—Educator, High School, Illinois

Writing the plans is very time consuming. Every step has to be explained, and that takes a lot of time. Making an answer key and practice problems is time consuming. It’s not enough to say “practice rounding numbers up to the nearest thousand;” you need concrete examples and answers. Subs often don’t follow the plans. They skip steps and don’t insist that students complete things. Subs can have terrible classroom management, and that leads to problems when you return. Subs don’t clean up or ask the kids to clean up.—Educator, Elementary, Massachusetts

Holding students accountable for what did or did not happen while I was out.—Educator, High School, Washington

Unfamiliarity with technology; late arrivals (not arriving before students arrive means no time to read plans or prepare); our district pays the worst sub wages in the county; subs don’t seem to have intuitive behavior management skills, so problem behaviors escalate; lesson plans need to be “dumbed down” significantly, or lesson time is wasted because the sub made changes to the plan.—Educator, Elementary, New York

Finding ones with good classroom management [who] can follow directions [is challenging].—Educator, High School, New York

Having a sub who doesn’t “believe” in science. I had one—for a two-day absence while I was at a conference—try to convince my students that climate change wasn’t real, and scoffed though the entire video clip and reading the students were to complete.—Educator, Middle School, Connecticut

Not knowing exactly what happens in my room throughout the day. Substitutes do not always leave the best or most detailed notes. If you send a student out for any reason, I need to know why.—Educator, Middle School, Michigan

How much to prepare for them…can they fill in the spaces of a general lesson outline?—Educator, High School, British Columbia, Canada

I just don’t like putting my job in someone else’s hands!—Educator, Elementary, Texas

All of it [is problematic]. There’s someone invading your space! I’ve had substitutes [who] have left my classroom a mess…I’ve had subs that have yelled very rude things at my students. I usually just have my subs show movies. They don’t know my subject or the students. It’s just easier to show movies. And that way, there’s less of an aftermath to deal with.—Educator, Elementary, California

Are they technologically competent? Do they have enough content knowledge to respond to student questions? Will they follow my lesson plan to the best of their ability?—Educator, High School, Hawaii

As a control freak, not having control of what is done in my classroom.—Educator, High School, Maine

Classroom management issues—the room is torn apart, and the assignment is not distributed.—Educator, High School, Washington, D.C.

Content knowledge and ability to help the students with high school science concepts [is important].—Educator, High School, Illinois

Getting everything prepared, and trying to think of anything they might need or what could possibly go wrong and trying to prevent it takes up a lot of time. Our school requires a sub notebook. Setting it up in the beginning takes time, but it’s really helpful once it’s done.—Educator, Middle School, Oklahoma

Not all of the subs are respected by the kids. We have a sub shortage in our area, so when we are out sick, many times other teachers are losing planning time to sub for me.—Educator, Middle School, Pennsylvania

Creating lesson plans and not knowing who my sub is and then praying that [he or she] will follow the plans.—Educator, Middle School, Iowa

Creating lesson plans that are self-standing so that if my sub has no knowledge of science, which is typical, the students can still move ahead.—Educator, High School, Minnesota

Developing lessons that the sub can handle and [that] tie to the concept being taught at the time. I do not want it to be a wasted day.—Educator, Middle School, California

Every person handles things differently. Subs tend to be more lenient with discipline in the classroom. Some subs will work hard and walk around to make sure students are doing what they are supposed to, as well as assist the students. Some subs just sit at a desk and do nothing, letting the students run wild.—Educator, Middle School, High School, Pennsylvania

Finding a competent substitute for an extended period of time [is difficult].—Educator, Institution of Higher Learning, Missouri
Finding activities that are suitable for someone who does not necessarily have a science back ground [isn’t easy].—Educator, High School, Nevada

I feel that it is too dangerous for the substitute to do labs, so students miss out on hands-on activities. The exception is when I had a long-term substitute [who] had a background in teaching science.—Educator, High School, West Virginia

I never have a lab scheduled for that day. There are way too many safety concerns, and a background is needed to know that what they are doing (or not doing) is correct and will not put anyone at risk.—Educator, High School, Illinois

It is difficult to maintain an inquiry-based classroom with a substitute.—Educator, High School, Nebraska

It is so much more work to be absent…I’ve returned early to find the sub with his feet up on my desk reading the newspaper and students doing whatever. I’ve also had a sub [who] doesn’t speak or read English.—Educator, Middle School, Texas

Lack of science background. Lack of classroom management skills. The one substitute teacher that takes classroom supplies—copy paper, file folders, tape, stapler—[without permission].—Educator, High School, Florida

Lack of support for the sub [occurs] in our school. Some students tend to behave horribly and take advantage. Only repercussion may be from teacher when they return.—Educator, Middle School, New Jersey

Making sure I have all of the details spelled out. I once had a sub think the activity was too boring the way it was supposed to be done, so she let the students do whatever they wanted with the materials. Luckily there weren’t any chemicals that [could have] had bad interactions [when mixed] out.—Educator, Middle School, Iowa

Most subs cannot help students with physics problems.—Educator, High School, Pennsylvania

No matter how hard I try to make my lessons self-explanatory and easy to follow, I end up needing time before and after a lesson to make sure kids understood the material. Often sub days lead to misconceptions and missed concepts. I also have to leave detailed notes on kids so that there aren’t behavior problems. The subs in my building do not trust kids and seem to not even like teenagers, so they rarely give kids what they need to be successful unless it is explicitly written down.—Educator, Middle School, Wisconsin

Not being there to answer questions or follow up with student understanding [bothers me].—Educator, High School, California

Not following the detailed plans I spent months preparing [before] maternity leave. I had to reteach an entire unit.—Educator, High School, Rhode Island

Planning something a non-science person can teach [is typical].—Educator, Middle School, Nebraska

Subs rarely follow lesson plans at my school or reinforce class expectations and norms. I have had class materials stolen or damaged while I have been out.—Educator, High School, Michigan

The fact [is] my district only pays $85 a day, so it’s hard to even get a sub to cover classes, much less a qualified science teacher.—Educator, High School, Colorado

[I dislike t]he time wasted planning “sub-proof” lessons and missing instructional time with my students.—Educator, High School, Michigan

There are not enough substitutes available, so when calling in an absence, I do not know if the school will actually find someone.—Educator, High School, Michigan

They do not know lab safety: They do not have any knowledge of the equipment and chemicals that could be in the room. They also bring coffee and a book most times.—Educator, High School, New Jersey

They do not know the structure of the course; they do not know content well enough to help students if they have questions. I almost always schedule a test for a planned absence so that I don’t lose instructional time, since subs cannot be relied upon to provide direct instruction or even supervision.—Educator, High School, Virginia

Not knowing how they are going to treat my students [troubles me]; the majority of my class is special [education]/behavioral.—Educator, Elementary, Alabama

We are on an alternate day block, and it is important that a whole block doesn’t get wasted. The biggest challenge is trying to design the lesson so that the students can get the most out of the lesson and know they are capable of forging on when I am not there. Once this classroom culture is established, it is not as difficult to be gone (usually at trainings/meetings).—Educator, High School, Wisconsin

[I mind w]hen they do not follow plans as written. Even small changes are difficult to account for.—Educator, Middle School, Nebraska

This article originally appeared in the November 2016 issue of NSTA Reports, the member newspaper of the National Science Teachers Association. Each month, NSTA members receive NSTA Reports, featuring news on science education, the association, and more. Not a member? Learn how NSTA can help you become the best science teacher you can be.

The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.

Follow NSTA

Facebook icon Twitter icon LinkedIn icon Pinterest icon G+ icon YouTube icon Instagram icon

How often each year does a substitute typically teach your classes? 0.5%=Never. 23.9% Once or Twice. 46.8% Three to Four Times. 28.6% Five or More Times.

 

What’s Ahead for Science and STEM Education in the Trump Administration?

By Jodi Peterson

Posted on 2016-11-16

With the election now in the rear view mirror, what’s ahead for education and science education in the new Administration?

Short answer, it’s too early to tell. During the campaign, education was largely ignored, so the education priorities for the new Administration are still a work in progress. Both the House and Senate remained in Republican hands, making it easier under a one-party rule to advance key Republican priorities under the new President-elect.

Politico is reporting that key policy plans for the first 100 days in the new Trump Administration would include scraping regulations from the Obama Administration on climate change, immigration, Wall Street, and restrictions on gun sales; proposing a $1 trillion infrastructure plan to rebuild highways, tunnels, bridges and airports; repealing Obamacare, backing out from trade deals, such as the TPP; and building a wall at the border.

The transition team is in overdrive, and a favorite parlor game in Washington D.C. this time of year is speculating on players on the new Administration team. President-elect Trump has vowed to “drain the swamp,” but the Trump transition team is apparently leaning toward veterans from the Reagan and Bush presidencies to help craft policy and fill key positions.

In education, several names have been floated for Ed Secretary, including Gov. Mitch Daniels, Gov. Scott Walker, William Evers, and Gerard Robinson.

(NSTA spearheaded efforts among nine STEM education groups and created a transition document addressing how the federal government must continue to make strategic investments in K–12 STEM education. Read NSTA Executive Director David Evans blog and the transition document for STEM education, which was recently sent to the Trump transition team.)

Here are the issues that are emerging and what we are watching:

President-elect Trump has voiced support for eliminating the Department of Education and expanding school choice by creating a $20 billion block grant. One to watch is the school choice legislation—first introduced in 2014 by Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN), current chair of the Senate education committee (and author of the Every Student Succeeds Act)—that would allow states to create a $2,100 scholarship from existing federal funds that would follow the children to the school of their choice.

During the campaign Trump has also said he’d get rid of the Education Department, a promise also made by previous GOP administrations. Many expect he will downsize the ED, which was expected anyway in response to the new federal education law which puts more decisions in the hands of state and district leaders.

The President-elect has also called for eliminating the Common Core State Standards, but the new federal law prohibits the education secretary from prescribing or interfering with state academic standards.

As mentioned earlier, President-elect Trump is expected to use executive authority to undo hundreds of Obama’s regulations on energy, taxes, and health care so expect changes to the regulations being proposed to implement the Every Student Succeeds Act.

Education Secretary John B. King Jr. has proposed strong regulations on accountability and the Title I supplement-not-supplant language, regulations which leading Republicans have called an intrusion into local schools and classrooms and an overreach by the Department. Aides to Sen. Alexander have told media outlets this past week that the U.S. Department of Education will be “appropriately diminished,” and Sen. Alexander has said he expects the President-elect to ensure the new law is implemented as written and anticipates that regulations will be overturned.

Another candidate for the regulatory chopping block: the Obama Administration’s controversial teacher preparation regulations.

Some changes on Capitol Hill that will affect education next year: House education chair John Kline (R-MN) retired this year, so Virginia Foxx (R-NC), who has served on the committee for 11 years, will likely become chair of the House education panel. She is a vocal critic of the Department of Education and for reducing the role of the federal government in education. Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA) returns as ranking Democrat.

Sen. Lamar Alexander will likely continue as chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee, and Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) will likely be ranking Democrat. As you will recall, these two lawmakers came together last year for the bipartisan reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Up next year will be reauthorization of the Higher Education Act, reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and legislation dealing with career and technical education (Perkins).

And finally, not surprisingly, the science community is reacting strongly to the election of Trump, (read more about his plans for science in the Presidential Science Debate 2016), some articles of interest are below.

Prospects for the Environment, and Environmentalism, Under President Trump

Paris climate deal at risk of falling apart following Trump victor

What surprise Trump victory means for engineering and technology

Trump: The Most Anti-Science President Ever?

Stay tuned, and watch for more updates in future issues of NSTA Express.

Jodi Peterson is Assistant Executive Director of Legislative & Public Affairs for the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) and Chair of the STEM Education Coalition. Reach her via e-mail at jpeterson@nsta.org or via Twitter at @stemedadvocate.

The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.

 


Follow NSTA

Facebook icon Twitter icon LinkedIn icon Pinterest icon G+ icon YouTube icon Instagram icon

 

With the election now in the rear view mirror, what’s ahead for education and science education in the new Administration?

Short answer, it’s too early to tell. During the campaign, education was largely ignored, so the education priorities for the new Administration are still a work in progress. Both the House and Senate remained in Republican hands, making it easier under a one-party rule to advance key Republican priorities under the new President-elect.

 

How many "labs?"

By Mary Bigelow

Posted on 2016-11-16

5229139935_f4b54c053c_mI’m a first-year biology teacher. How do I decide how many labs I could or should do each week. My colleagues have different ideas about this.  —L., South Carolina

Sometimes the word lab is used to describe any activities students do in groups in science class including investigations, experiments, projects, teacher demonstrations, laptop or tablet activities, simulations, games, small-group discussions, and group writing assignments.

While these activities can be useful learning strategies, let’s assume you are referring to studying a phenomenon or answering a question through investigations, experiments, projects, or constructing and using models.

Some of these studies may take less than a class period, while other investigations may require more time or even a long-term commitment spanning several days, weeks, or months. Many teachers often start with an activity prior to presenting content to provide students with a context. 

In terms of learning science, the quality of the activities is more important than the quantity. The type and number of activities depend on the learning goals, student interests, and whether an activity can be done safely in your classroom with the materials and time you have.

Doing an activity for its own sake without a meaningful context or without student input, follow-up, or reflection leads to questions about what students are learning and whether they truly understand the relationships and connections among concepts, practices, and content. (I once overheard a teacher saying “I keep my students so busy they don’t have time to think.”)

So…I don’t have a definitive answer to your question. But I would advise against using “labs” as an incentive for good behavior or take them away as a consequence for unrelated behavior. Of course, if students are engaging in unsafe or dangerous behavior during the activity, you will have to deal with that situation immediately.

5229139935_f4b54c053c_mI’m a first-year biology teacher. How do I decide how many labs I could or should do each week. My colleagues have different ideas about this.  —L., South Carolina

 

The Green Room: Losing Sight of Our Stars

By sstuckey

Posted on 2016-11-16

Making Your Teaching More Environmentally Friendly

Los Angeles at night

Los Angeles at night

The more people there are, the more lights we use. The more lights we use to illuminate our buildings and streets, the brighter the Earth becomes at night.

Author David Owen discussed the increase in this light pollution over the past 50 years in a 2007 New Yorker article. “The stars have not become dimmer; rather, the Earth has become vastly brighter, so that celestial objects are harder to see. Air pollution has made the atmosphere less transparent and more reflective, and high levels of terrestrial illumination have washed out the stars overhead—a phenomenon called ‘sky glow’” (Owen 2007).

Many resources can help inform your students about light pollution. The United Kingdom’s Telegraph newspaper has a gallery of images. James Madison University (JMU) professor Paul Bogard details in a book (2013) the environmental and human health effects of light pollution and the importance of darkness. The John C. Wells Planetarium on the JMU campus provides supplemental information, including a video, on its website.

Various organizations and municipalities are working to minimize light pollution sources. For instance, the International Dark-Sky Association (IDA) “works to protect the night skies for present and future generations,” offering information and a video online. Another group, Dark Skies, Inc., was recently featured in the New York Times for its efforts to reduce light pollution in Colorado (Healy 2016).

Classroom activities
Light pollution is an interesting topic for students. You can lead an evening field trip of star-gazing, but there are other options, too. The resource guide from the Astronomical Society of the Pacific has links to many books, articles, websites, and activities dedicated to light pollution. Some of the activities come from Globe at Night, an organization which raises awareness of light pollution and encourages people to measure their local night-sky brightness.

In addition, your students can manipulate a global light pollution map online by adding layers and exploring any location on Earth. From the American Museum of Natural History comes the “Light Pollution: Beyond the Glare” activity in which students watch an introductory video and complete a graphic organizer. Taking at least 50 minutes of class time is PBS’s “Which Way to the Ocean?” lesson plan. Using clips from the 2012 PBS film The City Dark, this thorough activity demonstrates the effects of light pollution on nesting loggerhead turtles.

Finally, the National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) produced a series of activities about light and light pollution in 2015, the International Year of Light. Pick and choose among all of the options on the NOAO website.

Amanda Beckrich (aabeckrich@gmail.com) is the Upper School assistant director, International Baccalaureate (IB) diploma program coordinator, and an environmental science teacher at Christ Church Episcopal School in Greenville, South Carolina.

References
Bogard, P. 2013. The end of night: Searching for natural darkness in an age of artificial light. Boston: Little Brown and Company.
Healy, J. New York Times. 2016. Colorado Towns Work to Preserve a Diminishing Resource: Darkness. August 12.
http://nyti.ms/2bnIAdQ
Owen, D. The New Yorker. 2007. The dark side: Making war with light pollution. August 20. http://bit.ly/2btPuxr

Editor’s Note

This article was originally published in the November 2016 issue of The tst_nov16_covScience Teacher journal from the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA).

Get Involved With NSTA!

Join NSTA today and receive The Science Teacher,
the peer-reviewed journal just for high school teachers; to write for the journal, see our Author GuidelinesCall for Papers, and annotated sample manuscript; connect on the high school level science teaching list (members can sign up on the list server); or consider joining your peers at future NSTA conferences.

Making Your Teaching More Environmentally Friendly

Los Angeles at night

Los Angeles at night

 

Dear President-Elect Trump: Make STEM a National Imperative

By David Evans, NSTA Executive Director

Posted on 2016-11-15

The presidential election last week surprised everyone, delighted some, and confounded quite a few.

Wherever you landed on this spectrum post-election day, as teachers, there is one thing that we can all agree on: that we must work even harder now to ensure that our students—all students—have the necessary tools and the opportunities to develop critical thinking skills so they can make informed decisions.

We know that what you do will probably get a lot harder in the years ahead, with expected challenges to standards and key science concepts such as climate science and evolution. Working together, we must make it clear that we are teaching a nation of citizens how to think like scientists to solve problems and understand how the natural world works. We need to make sure all students have the tools to assess what is reported on the news, to process medical information, and to understand the challenges ahead.

Effective STEM education will also prepare students for the jobs President-Elect Trump has talked so much about. In your classroom right now sits the future workforce and the next generation of engineers who will improve our standard of living in the years ahead and ensure our national security with technologies we cannot even begin to imagine.

But for this to happen, the federal government must continue to make strategic investments in the K–12 STEM education critical to the foundation of our future workforce, our national security, and our science- and technology-literate society.

Several months ago at the STEM Forum in Denver, teachers and teacher leaders told us what they would like to see in the new Administration. With this information in hand, I brought together the executive directors of nine education organizations to craft this transition document for STEM education, which was recently sent to the Trump transition team. Take a minute to read this document and tell us what you think.

Science teachers, it’s time to put on our capes and get to work. NSTA will be with you, every step of the way.

NSTA Executive Director David EvansDr. David L. Evans is the Executive Director of the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). Reach him via e-mail at devans@nsta.org or via Twitter @devans_NSTA.

The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.

 

 


Follow NSTA

Facebook icon Twitter icon LinkedIn icon Pinterest icon G+ icon YouTube icon Instagram icon

The presidential election last week surprised everyone, delighted some, and confounded quite a few.

Wherever you landed on this spectrum post-election day, as teachers, there is one thing that we can all agree on: that we must work even harder now to ensure that our students—all students—have the necessary tools and the opportunities to develop critical thinking skills so they can make informed decisions.

 

Focus on Physics: The Moon Is Falling!

By sstuckey

Posted on 2016-11-15

Sometimes it seems like everything is in free fall—the stock market, the value of your home, even your outlook for progress in the world. And now you learn this disturbing fact: The Moon is falling! And falling directly toward Earth! But you needn’t be alarmed, because it’s been falling like this for billions of years.

Tangential velocity
A falling Moon shouldn’t be scary because as it falls, it also travels “sideways” with enough speed to keep it from getting closer to us. We call this sideways motion tangential velocity. With sufficient tangential velocity, the Moon and all artificial Earth satellites fall around rather than into our planet.

Newton’s universal law of gravity
Isaac Newton was well aware of orbital motion when he undertook his studies of gravity. He reasoned that a projectile with sufficient speed could circle Earth without touching its surface (Figure 1). He saw the Moon as a projectile

Figure 1. This drawing by Isaac Newton shows that a cannonball fired fast enough from a tall mountain could fall all the way around Earth without touching its surface.

Figure 1. This drawing by Isaac Newton shows that a cannonball fired fast enough from a tall mountain could fall all the way around Earth without touching its surface.

circling Earth while being pulled by gravity. 

If somehow gravity between Earth and the Moon suddenly vanished, then—like a stone released from a swinging slingshot—the Moon would fly off in a straight-line path. Newton’s first law of motion tells us that if no force acts on a moving object, the object will continue moving in a straight line. But because gravity does act on the Moon, it falls beneath the straight-line path it otherwise would follow (Figure 2).

 

Figure 2. Two ways to know something falls: It gets closer to the floor (left) or farther from the ceiling (right). Satellites fall beneath “straight-line ceilings.”

Figure 2. Two ways to know something falls: It gets closer to the floor (left) or farther from the ceiling (right). Satellites fall beneath “straight-line ceilings.”

Like the Moon, the International Space Station (ISS) continuously circles Earth. Although a thrusting force put the ISS into orbit, once it attained sufficient tangential velocity it could orbit solely due to gravity. Except for small corrections, the only force keeping any Earth satellite in orbit is gravitational. 

How much velocity is needed for orbit?
How much velocity does a projectile need to orbit Earth? The calculation is straightforward if we know two things. The first is that near Earth’s surface, a freely falling object will fall a vertical distance of five meters in its first second, whether it’s simply dropped or tossed at different horizontal speeds (Figure 3). A tossed object, whether a ball or satellite, falls vertically beneath where it would have been if there were no gravity. The dashed line in the figure shows the path that would be taken if gravity were absent.

Figure 3. A horizontally tossed ball falls beneath the dashed line a vertical distance of 5 m in its first second of fall—regardless of its initial velocity.

Figure 3. A horizontally tossed ball falls beneath the dashed line a vertical distance of 5 m in its first second of fall—regardless of its initial velocity.

When we’re considering the trajectory of a baseball or football, it’s okay to assume that Earth’s surface is flat. But for a projectile traveling at extremely high speeds, we need to account for Earth’s curvature. So the second thing to know to calculate orbital speed is that the surface of Earth curves a vertical distance of 5 m for each 8,000 m tangent (Figure 4). Therefore, if air resistance can be neglected, what minimum velocity is needed for a projectile to orbit Earth?

Figure 4. Earth’s curvature (not to scale).

Figure 4. Earth’s curvature (not to scale).

A satellite’s path must match Earth’s curvature
Imagine an ideal super cannon that fires a projectile horizontally across a desert floor. Can you see that it would strike the ground at any speed less than 8,000 m/second? And can you see that if fired at 8,000 m/second, at the end of its first second it would fall 5 m beneath a straight-line path without getting closer to the ground? Furthermore, with no air resistance to slow its speed, it would still be traveling at 8,000 m/second at the end of one second. Additional thought tells you that it will continue moving at 8,000 m/second for any number of seconds and will fall 5 m for each 8,000 m tangent. Its curved path would match the curvature of Earth— and it would be in Earth orbit (Figure 5).

Figure 5. A projectile moving tangentially to Earth’s surface at 8,000 m/s in the absence of air resistance will be in Earth orbit. The curved line shows the orbital path.

Figure 5. A projectile moving tangentially to Earth’s surface at 8,000 m/s in the absence of air resistance will be in Earth orbit. The curved line shows the orbital path.

Falling around Earth
In the real world, air resistance and obstructions near the surface of Earth would not allow a projectile to maintain its orbital speed. However, if the projectile were above virtually all of the atmosphere, and it reached the necessary tangential velocity, it would fall around rather than into Earth. Such is the case of the ISS. At a height of 330 to 435 km above Earth, and at a speed of 7,660 m/second, the ISS follows a path though space that matches the curvature of Earth. Note that as the altitude of a satellite increases, its tangential velocity decreases, as does the distance that it falls vertically. The ISS travels somewhat slower than 8,000 m/second. The speed of the Moon is considerably less.

Astronauts in the ISS are in a continuous state of free fall—motion caused by

Figure 6. Without a support force, you feel weightless.

Figure 6. Without a support force, you feel weightless.

Earth’s gravity. Astronauts feel weightless because of the absence of a support force (Figure 6)—not because there’s no gravity! When you step off a diving board, you also feel weightless, even though gravity is obviously acting on you. Gravity at the elevation of the ISS is about 93% of that at Earth’s surface. How about that!

 

The Moon is approximately 384,000 km from Earth, but even at that vast distance, Earth’s gravity is about 0.03% of that at Earth’s surface—just enough to pull the Moon into an almost circular state of free fall. The Moon has been falling around Earth for billions of years and is expected to continue doing so for billions more.

Now, if the Moon or any satellite were somehow stopped in its tracks, with no tangential velocity, OUCH! Its fall would be devastating. Be glad that satellites have tangential velocities suitable for their distances from Earth. Hooray for Earth satellites! And hooray for gravity.

Paul G. Hewitt (pghewitt@aol.com) is the author of the popular textbook Conceptual Physics, 12th edition, and coauthor with his daughter Leslie and nephew John Suchocki of Conceptual Physical Science, 6th edition.

On the web
See complementary tutorial screencast 50 at www.HewittDrewIt.com. Related lessons are screencasts 45, 46, 47, and 49.

Editor’s Note

This article was originally published in the November 2016 issue of The tst_nov16_covScience Teacher journal from the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA).

Get Involved With NSTA!

Join NSTA today and receive The Science Teacher,
the peer-reviewed journal just for high school teachers; to write for the journal, see our Author GuidelinesCall for Papers, and annotated sample manuscript; connect on the high school level science teaching list (members can sign up on the list server); or consider joining your peers at future NSTA conferences.

Sometimes it seems like everything is in free fall—the stock market, the value of your home, even your outlook for progress in the world. And now you learn this disturbing fact: The Moon is falling! And falling directly toward Earth! But you needn’t be alarmed, because it’s been falling like this for billions of years.

 

New NSTA Infographic Explores How Today's Students Learn Science

By Cindy Workosky

Posted on 2016-11-14

As a member of the NSTA communications team, I often field questions from a wide variety of audiences—teachers, parents, school and district leaders, business leaders and reporters—about the exciting new developments in science teaching and learning promoted in the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) and the Framework for K-12 Science Education. For sure, there is a transformation occurring in science education and all stakeholders need and want to know what it all means.

girl-hairNSTA’s newest infographic—How today’s students learn SCIENCE—helps all audiences better understand some of the important shifts of the NGSS.  Presented in a fun, comic-book style, it showcases science and engineering practices in action, such as developing models, planning and carrying out investigations, and designing solutions using engineering and technology. For example, in one panel, a young girl wonders why her hair stands on end when she touches a Van de Graaff generator. Observing, posing questions, and making sense of phenomena are important scientific practices of the NGSS, and as Joe Krajcik said in his blog, “Making sense of phenomena and designing solutions drives the teaching and learning process.”

Girl testing waterThe infographic is the second in a series on the NGSS and is available now on the NGSS@NSTA Hub. The first infographic explored the reasons why it was time for new science education standards.  Additional infographics will appear in the coming months and will explore various elements of the NGSS and the support needed to implement them in schools and districts around the country. Find all infographics on the NGSS@NSTA Hub.

NSTA launched the infographic series as a way to support teachers, schools and district leaders, parents, business leaders, and other stakeholders, as they transition to a new way of teaching and learning science. Seventeen states, the District of Columbia, and numerous districts around the country have already adopted the NGSS and are making steady progress on building awareness of the standards, helping teachers understand the changes needed in classroom instruction, identifying and developing classroom materials, mapping out curricula, and more.

 

Cindy Workosky is a Communications Representative for NSTA.Author image C Workosky

 


Visit NSTA’s NGSS@NSTA Hub for hundreds of vetted classroom resources, professional learning opportunities, publicationsebooks and more; connect with your teacher colleagues on the NGSS listservs (members can sign up here); and join us for discussions around NGSS at an upcoming conference.

The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.

Future NSTA Conferences

2016 Area Conferences

2016 National Conference

Follow NSTA

Facebook icon Twitter icon LinkedIn icon Pinterest icon G+ icon YouTube icon Instagram icon
 

As a member of the NSTA communications team, I often field questions from a wide variety of audiences—teachers, parents, school and district leaders, business leaders and reporters—about the exciting new developments in science teaching and learning promoted in the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) and the Framework for K-12 Science Education. For sure, there is a transformation occurring in science education and all stakeholders need and want to know what it all means.

 

Equity in Science Education Begins in Prek

By Peggy Ashbrook

Posted on 2016-11-13

Welcome to my colleague Lauren Allen who co-authored this blog post. 

Lauren Allen is currently an administrator focused on STEM Integration in the District of Columbia. While originally from South Carolina, she earned a BS in Biology with an emphasis in Molecular Biology from Hampton University and a MS in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from Georgetown University.  Lauren serves on the leadership team for DC STEM Network and a group leader the 100Kin10 Fellowship Program, focused on supporting active STEM learning in grades P-3. She taught middle school science for six years and has worked in variety of science administration and educational positions.


Child scoops up blue water.All young children are “science” kids. In addition to the traits children are born with, their experiences shape their development (NAS). With many opportunities to engage in science explorations and investigations, their understanding grows and they develop  critical thinking skills. Being immersed in an exploration is the best way for young children to learn about the world. Science investigations are powerful experiences in which children use and build their literacy and math skills alongside the practices of science. How can we can make sure that all children get involved in those immersive science experiences where they use their skills to pursue a question that interests them?

At the National Association for the Education of Young Children’s (NAEYC) national conference, many early childhood educators from varied programs were eager to learn best practices in science education. We discussed the National Science Teachers Association’s position statement on science in early childhood that states, “At an early age, all children have the capacity and propensity to observe, explore, and discover the world around them.” This NSTA position statement was endorsed by the NAEYC.

Teachers in a professional development session.

Teachers work together observing beetle larvae.

 

 

 

 

 

The NAEYC’s position statement on Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8 (2009) provides a framework for best practice to promote excellence in early childhood education. It is also grounded in research. The statement highlights three challenges in early childhood education: “reducing learning gaps and increasing the achievement of all children; creating improved, better connected education for preschool and elementary children; and recognizing teacher knowledge and decision making as vital to educational effectiveness” (NAEYC Pg 2).

Teacher discusses a tally chart of smells with child.Solutions for these challenges all involve access to professional development, support, and growth for educators. Panel discussions at the May 2016 event “Fostering STEM Trajectories,” produced by New America’s Education Policy Program and the Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop, highlighted that the well-being and preparation of early education teachers play a major role in student outcomes. Training, staffing structure, and resources all impact the teacher’s ability to incorporate science, technology, engineering and math in the classroom. Teachers of children 0-8 years old need better preparation to understand and meet the needs of all young children and their families and improved support to ensure the continuity of developmentally appropriate expectations for young children’s learning and behavior. Support for early childhood educators in the form of increased wages could reduce turnover, and promote additional education in child development (Shulte and Durana 2016). Additional education can happen within existing settings if funding is provided for additional hours for professional development (including hiring substitutes). Professional development and personal reflection focused on differentiation, assuring that all children can participate, and behavior management, to prevent expulsion of preschoolers (Gilliam), will build our nation’s next generation workforce’s capacity and propensity to observe, explore, and discover the world (Zero to Three). 

Teacher & child observe beetle larva.Early childhood educators in all areas and settings in the profession can help our nation lift up tomorrow’s leaders when given the tools and resources needed to successfully differentiate and actively engage early learners in science, technology, engineering and math practices. Teachers must be sensitive to children’s cultural and other differences, and be willing and have the skill to adjust instruction to meet children’s needs (NRC). Removing barriers to make learning personalized and relevant help close learning gaps by providing access to deeper learning in these content areas. According to Deborah Phillips, editor of “Neurons to Neighborhoods”, studies have shown that disparities in math and science develop early and can impact high school progress and student achievement in these subject areas.

If we truly want to improve the educational experiences of young learners, we must stop limiting them. We must support teachers in science teaching and let go of limited mindsets and assumptions regarding young learners and their abilities to “do science”. Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson when asked for advice on how to get kids interested in science commented, “We spend the first year of a child’s life teaching it to walk and talk and the rest of its life to shut up and sit down…Get out of their way. Put things in their midst that help them explore” (Big Think). We must prepare the learning environments that allow children the time, space, and class structures to explore, play, argue, and experiment. Early learners need to be engaged in active learning using the world around them and have engaged adults at their sides to help them reflect on their experiences. We must empower early educators in building a foundation in science for our next generation.

References

Big Think. May 13, 2013. Neil deGrasse Tyson: Want Scientifically Literate Children? Get Out of Their Way. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIEJjpVlZu0

Gilliam, Walter S., Angela N. Maupin, Chin R. Reyes, Maria Accavitti, Frederick Shic. 2016. Do Early Educators’ Implicit Biases Regarding Sex and Race Relate to Behavior Expectations and Recommendations of Preschool Expulsions and Suspensions? New Haven, CT: Yale University Child Study Center.

National Academy of Sciences (NAS). 2000. Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development. From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9824/from-neurons-to-neighborhoods-the-science-of-early-childhood-development

National Association for the Education of Young Children. (NAEYC). Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8 Adopted 2009. https://www.naeyc.org/positionstatements/dap

National Research Council (NRC). 2007. Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Science Teachers Association. 2014. Position Statement: Early Childhood Science Educationhttp://www.nsta.org/about/positions/earlychildhood.aspx

Schulte, Brigid and Alieza Durana. September 28, 2016. The New America Care Reporthttps://www.newamerica.org/better-life-lab/policy-papers/new-america-care-report/

The ZERO TO THREE Policy Center. https://www.zerotothree.org/

Resource

Fostering STEM Trajectories: Bridging ECE Research, Practice, & Policy. 2016. http://www.newamerica.org/education-policy/events/fostering-stem-trajectories/

Welcome to my colleague Lauren Allen who co-authored this blog post. 

 

#NSTA16 Portland: Come and Get Your Swag!

By Lauren Jonas, NSTA Assistant Executive Director

Posted on 2016-11-11

At NSTA’s Portland conference today at the membership booth, we’re giving away tickets to our LA conference next spring, tweet shirts (while supplies last), and gift cards. And that’s what you can win before you even step into the exhibit hall. Below is a sampling curated from Twitter of what our exhibitors are giving away (iPads, white boards, birdfeeders… to name just a few). So if you’re onsite, head to the exhibit hall and see what kind of fun you can have and swag you can score!
 

 

 

 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 


The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.

2016 Area Conferences

2017 National Conference

2017 STEM Forum & Expo

Follow NSTA

Facebook icon Twitter icon LinkedIn icon Pinterest icon G+ icon YouTube icon Instagram icon
At NSTA’s Portland conference today at the membership booth, we’re giving away tickets to our LA conference next spring, tweet shirts (while supplies last), and gift cards. And that’s what you can win before you even step into the exhibit hall. Below is a sampling curated from Twitter of what our exhibitors are giving away (iPads, white boards, birdfeeders… to name just a few).
Subscribe to
Asset 2