By Mary Bigelow
Posted on 2013-02-04
I am curious about the effectiveness of group or team tests given (maybe a week) before the actual, summative test. I am just beginning my student teaching, and think a group test might be a great way for students to share the responsibility of reviewing and would give the students who are less comfortable with the material a chance to hear it from other students. I know a group test cannot completely replace assessing individual students for comprehension of the material, but I’m wondering if students were given the opportunity to work together on a test reflecting the unit’s material as preparation for the day they take an individual test, would that be a helpful indication of where students are before they take the test?
–Reid from Eugene, Oregon
It’s been my experience that periodic, formative assessments during a unit of instruction are more helpful to both students and teachers compared to a single review at the end of the unit. The students get ongoing feedback on their learning and the teacher can address questions, misunderstandings, and incomplete understandings in a timely manner.
But you have an interesting question about the benefits of a summative review or study session. Since you’ve just started student teaching, you could discuss this with your cooperating teacher and observe how he or she handles this. As you observe or try different strategies, keep a log describing the activity and the results of the subsequent assessment. At some point, this could be an opportunity for a more structured action research project in the classroom—if not during student teaching then perhaps in your future classes.
Action research is inquiry or research focused on efforts to improve student learning. It is typically designed and conducted by teachers who analyze data from their own classrooms to improve their practice. Action research gives teachers opportunities to reflect on their teaching, explore and test new strategies, assess the effectiveness of these strategies, and make decisions about which ones to use. Action research models generally have several components, which I’ve annotated with some thoughts about your question:
Identify a focus area or research question. Your question actually raises other questions:
Implement a strategy and collect data. If you have more than one section, you could use a different form of review in each section. Debrief the students about their understanding of the purpose of a review. Observe the ways students do (or do not) participate. You could use photographs or videos to document the process. Examine what they are writing in their lab notebooks based on the review. Administer the test and score the results.
Analyze and interpret the data. How did the students perform on the test? Compare the test results to previous tests. If you tried different strategies, how did the results differ? Share your findings with students. Discuss any frustrations or other feedback from students.
Develop an action plan. You may need to try a strategy several times. Depending on your results, begin to assemble a “toolbox” of effective review strategies.
Action research is a systematic way to apply inquiry to your own teaching practices. The results of action research are often published in the NSTA journals. I hope that you will share your findings with us!
Resources:
Action Research
Action Research for Teachers
Action Research (NSTA’s Science Scope September 2010)
Photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/fontplaydotcom/504443770/
I am curious about the effectiveness of group or team tests given (maybe a week) before the actual, summative test. I am just beginning my student teaching, and think a group test might be a great way for students to share the responsibility of reviewing and would give the students who are less comfortable with the material a chance to hear it from other students.
By Mary Bigelow
Posted on 2013-02-01
My dad was a map-reader. We could spend hours browsing through an atlas or USGS topographic maps. Whenever a conversation centered on a particular location, his response was “Let’s get out the map!” One of the chief roles in family outings was that of navigator with a road map (this was before the age of GPS devices in the car).
As they say, nuts don’t fall far from the tree, so I’m a map nut, too. Even though I have a GPS, I usually have a road map open, too. The map wall was one of the centers in my middle school classroom. As we studied biomes, my students would annotate the maps with sticky notes and push pins for all to see.
So I was excited when I saw a press release from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) about a new resource:
Have you ever wanted to go back in time to see what the Earth looked like 400 million years ago? You can with the EarthViewer, a free, interactive app designed for the iPad, that lets users explore the Earth’s history with the touch of a finger by scrolling through 4.5 billion years of geological evolution. The app allows students to see continents grow and shift as they scroll through billions of years – from molten mass to snowball Earth. Students can also explore changes in the Earth’s atmospheric composition, temperature, biodiversity, day length, and solar luminosity over its entire development. The app, developed by HHMI’s BioInteractive team, tracks the planet’s continental shifts, compares changes in climate as far back as the planet’s origin, and explores the Earth’s biodiversity over the last 540 million years. It combines visual analysis with hard data, and helps students make connections between geological and biological change.
As a SciLinks webwatcher and reviewer, I have a great deal of respect for the science education resources from HHMI. (If you’re unfamiliar with their virtual labs, interactives, and animations, take a few minutes to browse and bookmark the HHMI site.) So I downloaded the app and explored for a while. The centerpiece is a virtual globe with a timeline on the left to scroll through time and options to view data charts, such as temperature or O2 and CO2 levels. For example, I centered the view over the north and south poles and over my hometown and looked at the mean temperature differences for the past 50 years. Seeing the change over time was stunning!
The “info” button has a brief tutorial showing some of the capabilities, and the HHMI EarthViewer website has additional resources and ideas. I suspect that students would catch on quickly, given a chance to explore. You can also Like this on Facebook to get updates and suggestions from other users.
I wish my dad were still with us – he would like this too!
Download the HHMI EarthViewer app from the App Store.
My dad was a map-reader. We could spend hours browsing through an atlas or USGS topographic maps. Whenever a conversation centered on a particular location, his response was “Let’s get out the map!” One of the chief roles in family outings was that of navigator with a road map (this was before the age of GPS devices in the car).
By Lauren Jonas, NSTA Assistant Executive Director
Posted on 2013-01-31
A recent tweet alerted me to the fact that “we have a choice between two futures, everyone with code literacy or only an elite few.” Coding has been on my radar for a while, but lately I can’t get online without being bombarded with why I should learn (Computers Free Us to Think in New Ways: BBC ) or ways I’ll be left behind if I don’t learn to code (Let’s Teach Kids to Code: TED). New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is learning to code (Learn to Code, Get a Job: CNN); even the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is urging us to “Get with the Programming”! So, I’m wondering, is everyone else on board already? Does the smattering of COBOL and Fortran I learned back in the dark ages count? What are schools doing to prepare? What can NSTA do to help? Let us know your thoughts!
A recent tweet alerted me to the fact that “we have a choice between two futures, everyone with code literacy or only an elite few.” Coding has been on my radar for a while, but lately I can’t get online without being bombarded with why I should learn (Computers Free Us to Think in New Ways: BBC ) or ways I’ll be left behind if I don’t learn to code (Let̵
By Peggy Ashbrook
Posted on 2013-01-29
The NAEYC Technology and Young Children Interest Forum has put together many resources for early childhood educators looking for guidance on what, when and how to use the broad range of digital and analog devices we have or are considering using in our programs. These resources supplement the joint position statement by NAEYC and Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media.
The NAEYC Technology and Young Children Interest Forum has put together many resources for early childhood educators looking for guidance on what, when and how to use the broad range of digital and analog devices we have or are considering using in our programs. These resources supplement the joint position statement by NAEYC and Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media.
By Mary Bigelow
Posted on 2013-01-29
My school provides some professional development money every two years for summer travel. This summer I would like to take an educational trip to Italy to visit Pompeii, Herculaneum, Vesuvius, some Galileo astronomy sights, or others that would fit into my discipline areas (Earth science and physics). Can you help me find anyone in the NSTA community who might know of professional development trips in Italy or know of science educational tours in Italy for which I could use my grant?
—Scott, Dallas, Texas
It’s hard for schools to provide specialized content knowledge and experiences, so you have a great opportunity for your own individualized professional development (PD). I posed your question on NSTA’s Earth Science listserve:
Another experienced educational traveler suggests contacting a university geology department or a geology professional organization to inquire about summer experiences. Even if they don’t have trips this summer, their previous itineraries may give you some suggestions for places to visit, they may have contacts in Italy, or they may know of other organizations that are sponsoring trips.
I also poked around the internet. Depending on how much exercise you want, check out the Sierra club outings. They have one this summer for hiking in the Dolomites, for example. A New York Times article has more ideas for Hiking Italy-Volcano to Volcano. And VolcanoTrek offers tours to Italian volcanoes. (—Please note, I don’t know anything about this company other than what’s on the website.)
Some additional thoughts on Scott’s question:
Many of our students have Individualized Education Plans to meet their needs. Perhaps its time for teachers to create IPDPs (Individualized Professional Development Plans) for themselves, particularly for content knowledge. Some districts already offer such an option for self-directed learning. Teachers set their own learning goals, design a learning strategy, document their activities, and describe how they will apply the new content knowledge. The plans require prior approval (especially if the district is awarding official PD hours) and usually teachers pay for the programs themselves but are then excused from some or all of the traditional inservice programs.
Scott describes what this looks like in his school:
Every year our parents’ association has events to raise money. They give a lot of that money to the school as part of our faculty grant program. People have been generous recently, and teachers are now eligible for $3000 every two years. The money can be used for anything that will improve our teaching. We submit an application that gets reviewed by the faculty grant evaluators (a revolving group of about six teachers) and if they agree that the plan will benefit the school and the students, they will approve it. It is much easier to get your plan approved if it is for schooling or part of an educational trip/tour (for example, the GSA Geoventures). It is possible to create your own itinerary explaining what and why you are going to do, but it is more difficult (but not impossible) to get approval. After the experience we have to write up a summary describing the experience and how we are going to use what we learned. The write-ups and descriptions are all kept in a binder so other teachers can read what their cohorts have done and get inspired to improve themselves too. It is a great program!
Photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dennischnapp/360214306/sizes/l/in/photostream/
My school provides some professional development money every two years for summer travel. This summer I would like to take an educational trip to Italy to visit Pompeii, Herculaneum, Vesuvius, some Galileo astronomy sights, or others that would fit into my discipline areas (Earth science and physics).
By Ken Roberts
Posted on 2013-01-25
In the not-so-distant past, many science teachers measured temperature with mercury-based thermometers and graphed the results of their experiments on graph paper. Perhaps some of you recall how problematic it was to clean up a broken mercury thermometer and cringe at the thought of a smeared pencil erasure after a correction was made to the graph paper of a lab report. In stark contrast to the old-fashioned scientific laboratory equipment of the past, a new tool known as the LabQuest 2 is available to science teachers. The LabQuest 2, a standalone unit interface, can be used to collect data from a sensor. Slightly larger than a cell phone, the LabQuest 2 is equipped with built-in graphing and analysis applications that combine integrated software for data collection and inquiry. The hardware includes a USB port and three analog ports and can collect data from multiple sensors simultaneously. Once data is collected, results can be saved on a USB flash drive for later transfer to a computer. In addition, the unit includes a built-in GPS, stopwatch, calculator, and even a microphone for remarks. The unit lends convenience to situations in which it’s undesirable or problematic to carry multiple instruments into the field. In a field test, the device was easy to use and worked well with both Macintosh and/ or Windows computer platforms. Moreover, it comes with easy-to-follow instructions for over a hundred labs and is compatible with more than 70 probes. From my perspective, it is remarkable that a multifaceted device such as this is so easy to use. Once data collection has occurred, the LabQuest 2 can complete data analysis and report the results via Wi-Fi using Vernier Data Share. Subsequently, rather than using a pencil and graph paper, the results can be exported to a spreadsheet and sent out as a PDF graph representation for analysis. This function is unique in that it allows students to e-mail, print, and share sensor-based data for the report. In summary, the LabQuest2 from Vernier is an outstanding tool to engage students in scientific inquiry. In my opinion, its reasonable price and ease of use make the LabQuest 2 a valuable tool for students conducting scientific investigations. It can help motivate them toward greater science achievement. If you’re interested in a versatile and cost-effective tool that is user friendly, look no further than Vernier’s LabQuest 2.
By Ken Roberts
Posted on 2013-01-25
This product is an idea for introducing young children to skills they will use for robotics and computer programming. Level 1 includes lightweight, flexible floor tiles, cards, and a guide booklet. Students tried Step Turn And Learn both in the classroom and outdoors. Any floor grid will do indoors, even a taped carpet. The tiles provided make it easy to take the activity outside where there might be more room for students to watch one another. The website directs viewers to a video. This narrated slide show gives the basic information about the product. Students look at symbols on cards that direct them as they move through the grid. Eventually the students will be designing the routes and organizing the cards. Children age seven and older handled the cards without problems, removing the top card and placing it at the bottom of the pile after following the instruction. Some younger children moved more than one card at a time, or dropped the cards. A teacher or an older student can hold the cards for the children as they work their way through the grid, moving around the array as the direction changes. As children pick up and later deposit an object, they can no longer juggle card manipulation. Students are to learn that the “Step Right” instruction means “Turn right and step one time.” The symbol glossary identifies this card with the caption “Step Right.” Identical symbols accompany these three instruction cards: “Step Forward,” “Step Left,” and “Step Right.” Arrows differentiate one card from the other, so students used the arrows and ignored the symbols. The product is announced as K–3 on the Bulletin Board at the website; PreK–4, on the accompanying literature. At the Oregon public elementary school where students tested it, children in grades 1 and 2 were able to grasp the concept, and they enjoyed it more than younger students. The Step Turn And Learn idea can initiate readiness for a complex, technological world without using any technology at all. It is portable, and the sequences are limited only by the users’ ability to strategize. Robotics tends to find its way into enrichment classes for academically successful students. This product can be used for all students and for more than one purpose. For example, students can organize the tiles in several arrays, preparing for comprehension of more advanced math concepts. From first grade up, students wanted to keep doing the activity. Younger students, confused at first, later got the idea and began helping one another. Step Turn And Learn allows students to design grids, paths, and strategies for getting from one place to another without having to read a single word. Therefore struggling readers and English learners may practice complex skills with the same access opportunity as their more literate classmates.
By Ken Roberts
Posted on 2013-01-25
It’s hard to write a review for Vernier’s motion sensor and not sound like I’m writing an advertisement. Between the interface to the software and number of possible applications, this is one of the most modular and versatile tools of scientific investigation a physics teacher is likely to encounter. Let’s start with the hardware. Unlike previous and different companies’ motion sensors, this one plugs in using the same USB cable your printer or scanner might use. That makes storage much easier, while it also means if I (or a student) manage to damage or misplace the cable, replacements are both cheap and plentiful. Thanks for going generic, Vernier! Now let’s talk applications. If you’re reading this, you’re probably a physics teacher, and you’re likely at some point to use a motion sensor like this to follow a cart, ball, or other object. Let me tell you, the Go!Motion sensor delivers. To measure the efficiency of a motor reeling in a vertically suspended shoe box, I used the motion sensor looking up at the shoe box from the floor. Worked perfectly. Same for a basketball dropped from under the motion sensor looking down. Same for a student carrying a whiteboard in a graph-matching exercise. It just works. In fact, I tried replacing my old photogate with the Go!Motion sensor to analyze the pendulum’s motion. Worked even better! I must admit a large par t of what makes the Go!Motion sensor a great piece of lab equipment is the software. Logger Pro is intuitive, straightforward, and inexpensive. For a typical pendulum experiment , I had previously had used a photogate to just measure the pendulum’s periods and average them over each trial. Using the Go!Motion sensor, I just placed it on a lab table, aimed it horizontally at the pendulum, and the sensor watched as the pendulumm approached and receded. Now it just became that much easier to teach simple harmonic motion, since I have demonstrable evidence that the motion of both the pendulum and a mass suspended from a spring are sinusoidal. And with the Curve Fit tool, I can fit a sine curve to my pendulum’s posi t ion-versus- t ime graph, get the period, and get the correlation so I know how confident I should be in the value. What could be easier? Putting it all together, if you want a device that just works for you, no questions asked, I would strongly recommend the Go!Motion sensor from Vernier. It’s great as a stand-alone product because of its USB functionality, but will also be backwards compatible if you do have older Vernier hardware on hand. Logger Pro allows students and teachers to have a very straightforward analysis of the data you collect in lab. It’s a lot of bang for the buck, and a site license costs as much as do many companies’ single-user licenses. Not only that, but when you call tech support, you might even be speaking with Dave Vernier himself.
By Peggy Ashbrook
Posted on 2013-01-24
Who better to meet, in this winter season, than someone from Minnesota who shares her ideas on how to enjoy the outdoors with children in her blog, Small Wonders?
(I especially enjoyed the post about wrestling with discussing possible truths about a butterfly’s end with her children.)
Patty participates in a physical science challenge.
Who better to meet, in this winter season, than someone from Minnesota who shares her ideas on how to enjoy the outdoors with children in her blog, Small Wonders?
(I especially enjoyed the post about wrestling with discussing possible truths about a butterfly’s end with her children.)