By Peggy Ashbrook
Posted on 2017-04-06
The National Science Teachers Association’s annual conference brings educators from many places in the world together to build their science teaching skills, science content, reaffirm connections with colleagues and make new connections. Arriving in LA, the lights and action were a striking contrast to the vibrant rainbow began my week but this change in environment is one of the reasons to travel to
an education conference. California big city delights included tall buildings whose faces changed with the time of day, public plantings so different from what I see at home, and architectural details recalling geometry and nature. I hope this conference recounting will inspire you to seek out NSTA experiences at conferences and resources online. Many, many conference session handouts are uploaded to the conference scheduler for you to access. Search for the sessions you attended or topics that interest you, click on the title and then scroll down to see and access uploaded files.
This is a long post but there is a cute dog picture at the end.
Anyone want to estimate how many selfies and photos with colleagues were taken this week? Very loosely based on the number of photos on my phone, at least 10 times thousands of attendees. Meeting up with early childhood colleagues who teach young children or preservice teachers, or write about science education, re-opens conversations begun at previous conferences or online. Science educators are fun people!
We also like to argue. One of the eight practices of science and engineering in the Next Generation Science Standards is Practice 7, Engaging in Argument from Evidence: “Argumentation is a process for reaching agreements about explanations and design solutions. In science, reasoning and argument based on evidence are essential in identifying the best explanation for a natural phenomenon. In engineering, reasoning and argument are needed to identify the best solution to a design problem.” In his Planetary Society Lecture, “Everything All at Once,” Bill Nye, Science Guy and CEO of The Planetary Society, spoke about his career journey and our collective responsibility to consider how scientific agreement identifying the best explanation for changes in climate due to human action should inform our individual actions and national priorities. The vibe in the room showed that we science educators are ready to go out and help our students change the world!
Did you have an eight o’clock session? Visiting the Exhibit Hall soon after opening meant there were fewer people in line to drive a Toyota Mirai. We sat in the real thing and drove models of it, competing against each other for the shortest time around the track. Many, but not all of us need additional practice to traverse the track in less than one minute!
The Mirai is a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle, just one of the new technologies in the Exhibit Hall. Feats of engineering were woven throughout the conference sessions, including one by Carrie Lynn Draper of Readiness Learning Associates who engaged us in designing a robotic hand that could lift a cup in “NGSS Connections for TK and Preschool STEM Larning.” The materials in this challenge for adult learners included some materials commonly found in early childhood programs. We had some success but wished for more time to learn from our failures and improve our designs—something to remember when designing schedules for young learners. The variety of designs developed for this simple task is a reminder that we cannot limit children to teacher-designed challenges with teacher-selected materials and teachers’ criteria for success. Look for problems that are important to children in your classroom and other locations and find time and materials for children design solutions to meet their needs.
View video clips of one educator’s design in action and her thoughts about redesign:
Video 1: A teacher engages in an engineering challenge to design and build a “hand” to lift a cup.
Video 2: A teacher describes how her designed tool works.
Video 3: A teacher describes what changes she might make to her designed tool to improve it.
Speaking of time…Thank you to the NSTA conference staff who work all year to make these experiences possible, and to the NSTA staff who develop the resources and communication platforms that allow us to keep learning. At the conference, Science and Children Managing Editor Valynda Mayes talked with conference participants at the Members Lounge as well as at sessions, and Flavio Mendez, NSTA Learning Center Senior Director connected us to Learning Center resources and the badges we accumulated through our use of the LC resources. Many other staff working the conference bookstore and others behind the scenes allow conference participants to get the most out of their use of NSTA resources and membership. Thank you to all the NSTA employees who make this conference possible and to the Conference Committee Leaders and local volunteers!
NSTA Press authors got to discuss their work in one-on-one conversations and explorations, and sign books so students will understand that books are written by real people and their teachers work hard to bring new ways of teaching back to the classroom. Lisa Nyberg and Julie McGough engaged us in the Power of Questioning and the Power of Investigating in Guiding Student Investigations, using water, clementines and candy. I got to sign books for educators who read my Early Years columns in Science and Children, and The Early Years blog, including for parents of one of the wonderful children who attended the conference, who asked, “Will you please dedicate this book to me?” I was delighted to!
The Learning Center staff, led by Flavio Mendez, know how to celebrate the effort Learning Center members/users make to attend a conference. This teacher from Australia was recognized for the distance she traveled and her birthday. Who says science teachers can’t sing? We also got to learn how the Learning Center is used to support student learning by universities and to celebrate the Houston and the Dallas Independent School Districts that participated in the ExxonMobil Teachers Academy.
If you participate in the NSTA email listservs you probably looked for names you recognized as valuable contributors to these online conversations, arguments, and resource sharing, in the program guide when choosing among sessions to attend. Eric Cromwell of the Baltimore County Public Schools Office of Science in Towson, MD presented a hands-on workshop on “Checkerspot Challenge: Early Childhood Engineering” for grades K-2. The endangered Checkerspot butterfly, the Maryland state insect, lays its eggs on the White Turtlehead plant that grows in wet areas and is a favorite snack for the state’s plentiful deer. How to maintain enough of this plant to grow and sustain the Checkerspot butterfly population? Eric taught us a strategy for helping children work in small groups to design a technology to protect the plants from deer foraging. He had us draw a large circle in the center of a large piece of newsprint, and divide the remaining space into four sections—this allows four people to first draw individual designs before sharing their ideas and discussing which components of each should go into the group’s first draft of a design to build and test. His state office ordered artificial flowers and a version of Tinkertoys, along with other materials for children to make models to represent their engineering design solution. When educators do engineering activities and participate in science inquiry ourselves, we experience the same design challenges children will engage in, learn what needs to be improved for children’s learning, and develop our understanding of the nature of science.
The leadership of NSTA includes grade level divisions who meet and plan how to best support the needs of educators at that level. The NSTA Preschool and Elementary Division collaborative session did a fabulous job in “Early Childhood Science Experiences: Laying the Foundation for More Complex Science Practices in the Future.” In just 60 minutes we were provided with four activities that represent a progression of increasing sophistication of student thinking in physical science (see APPENDIX E – Progressions Within the Next Generation Science Standards).
We constructed ramps and rolled objects down them, then redesigned the path to “make it better” and reach a goal we set for ourselves (go fast, go far, go up a slope, go around a corner, reach a cup…). We accepted a set of design constraints and made Puff Mobiles from a limited set of materials that we hoped would travel a set distance with just one puff of breath. We used plastic spoons, rubber bands, and tongue depressors to construct catapults.
And we designed “roller coasters” using materials that are a bit trickier to manipulate but allow greater flexibility in design.
Did you go to the Friday morning Elementary Extravaganza? I wouldn’t miss it, presenting this year about the concepts in my January 2016 Early Years column, property of matter, specifically foams. We made bubble foam and compared it to foams commonly used in our homes: cleaning sponges, natural sponges formed by ocean animals, foam curlers, and pipe insulating foam. After first feeling and describing the properties of water and dish soap, we used a simple tool and transformed the mixture into foam through the use of our force and motion.
I was happy to talk with principals and teachers from many different kinds of schools and other educational settings, all looking for resources, strategies, activities and other ideas to bring back to enrich their students’ education. It was interesting to compare how the few children present approached the materials compared with the adults who may have had much more experience with the materials—the children were more likely to ask to use the materials, and look at and follow the posted directions while adults often mixed ingredients without measuring or tried to use the whisks to blow bubbles. Do you think this means that science educators raise polite children or that we are a bunch of independent thinkers? The sample size was tiny so I’m not drawing a conclusion. In any case we all learned from our exploration! Want to share the work you presented at the Elementary Extravaganza? Post a comment below to relate your experience.
In my “NSTA Press® Session: Bringing the S-T-E-M Together in Early Childhood Using Science and Engineering Practices” session we looked at many photos of children engaged in science explorations and investigations. Thank you to my friend and colleague Marie Faust Evitt for sharing images of the work children do in her class. Through discussion we identified the science, engineering and math concepts involved and the technology used in children’s explorations, as well as which NGSS Science and Engineering Practices were in play.
Which of the eight NGSS science and engineering practices do you identify being used by these children?
Resources that support early childhood science teaching include the NSTA’s position statement on early childhood science education, endorsed by the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) and available to read and download from the NSTA website. I referred to the NGSS and the position statement when writing Science Learning in the Early Years: Activities for Pre-K-2 and in the Early Years columns in Science and Children.
The beauty of NSTA conferences is that there is more than one session on the same topic during the conference, but the terrible dilemma is that there may be more than one interesting or must-attend session scheduled at the same time. Some people have colleagues who will share their experiences, others go to the online session scheduler to download resources from sessions they missed, and others email presenters directly to ask the questions that bubbled up later.
Every session on concepts about sound had different strategies for helping students develop their understanding of the NGSS PS3.A Definitions of energy; PS3.B Conservation of energy and energy transfer; and PS4.A Wave properties. “Young Children Investigate and Engineer Sound Through STEM,” presented by Sonia Yoshizawa and Beth Van Meeteren, reviewed child development, grounding our exploration of sound in understanding that even very young children will manipulate different materials to investigate how sound can be made—and changed! Do your students use any of these materials in their investigations? See their book STEM Learning with Young Children: Inquiry Teaching with Ramps and Pathways (Teachers College Press 2015) and the Iowa Regents’ Center for Early Education in STEM to learn more about approaches to early childhood science explorations.
Only have 15 minutes a day to teach science? Or does your school only schedule science teaching once a week? Educators from Iowa have restructured their early elementary daily schedules to incorporate daily student time in science centers as teachers lead a small group reading. See handouts from Lisa Chizek and Vonna Watson of the North Tama County Community School District, and Marcy Seavey and Beth Van Meeteren of the University of Northern Iowa on the conference session scheduler. During the presentation on “Every Day STEM For Every First Grader,” participants asked questions throughout the hour—evidence of their hunger for strategies to incorporate more time for science investigations. I hope there is a mini-course on this next year.
The National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) has an interest forum that advocates for science teaching in early childhood, infant to age eight.
The NAEYC Early Childhood Science Interest Forum (ECSIF) was founded in 2011 and members have formed an active network of support. We invite you to join us! NAEYC members can join on the NAEYC website and everyone can view our public Facebook page. The NAEYC ECSIF held an informal meeting at the NSTA annual conference in Los Angeles to discuss our work through our memberships in NSTA and plans for the future.
Hope to see you online or at one of the NSTA area or national conferences!
The National Science Teachers Association’s annual conference brings educators from many places in the world together to build their science teaching skills, science content, reaffirm connections with colleagues and make new connections.
By Carole Hayward
Posted on 2017-04-05
In our earlier posts, we shared the many topics available and how teachers are using the student editions. In this post, we’ll share how to order the student editions and how students, teachers, and administrators can access and use the e-books.
If you are not already familiar with NSTA’s Enhanced E-books, envision supplemental curricula that keep your students engaged and interested. Content that is not just in the form of a digital textbook, but a multi-dimensional learning experience. Science-based e-books carefully crafted to dive deep into content areas, letting you know your students are learning important concepts. A place where science comes to life with a simple click or tap.
NSTA Reader Platform
How do students, teachers, and administrators access these interactive, inquiry-based content modules? It all starts in the NSTA Reader Platform. From here, students can access their library of e-books.
Each Student Edition falls into at least one of three scientific disciplines: Earth and Space Science, Life Science, and Physical Science. And with more than 20 Student Editions currently available and more in the making, think of the possibilities for your classroom.
The Student Editions are brimming with interactive elements and cognitive learning tools strategically integrated for an optimal learning experience.
The NSTA Reader platform is easy to navigate and includes these features:
These embedded tools make it easy to organize and guide learning:
How Students, Teachers, and Administrators Use the Platform
Each student has his or her own user ID, so each have their own individual space in which to interact. As the teacher, you can track each student’s progress by assigning readings, homework, and assessments all through the NSTA Reader Platform. You can also give narrative feedback to your students along with numeric grades. Complete management of the learning material is at your fingertips.
The Student Editions are all online, so they can be accessed anywhere at anytime. If students don’t have internet access, they can also be downloaded for offline use. They can be used on your desktop, laptop, or tablet devices.
Students go to the NSTA Reader or use the NSTA Reader app. They log in using the username and password that is assigned to them by their teachers.
They are available for Apple and Android devices as well as most Chromebooks. To view online or offline via the NSTA Reader app for iPad and Android tablets, download the app from the appropriate link.
The student editions are housed on a Child Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) compliant site. The student editions are licensed for a period of one year. In the near future there will be multiyear options.
Once logged in, students and teachers have a suite of tools available to them. Go here to view student tools. Go here to view teacher tools.
Administrators can assign teachers to classes; keep track of teachers teaching what class with what material; bulk upload classes and teachers; add review questions; view content assigned to a class or to a student; send a message/notification to the student; view license information, content library, and e-book usage analytics. NSTA provides step-by-step instructions for using the NSTA Reader as an administrator.
All purchases of eBooks+ Student Editions must be completed through NSTA’s Customer Service Department. Order by phone (1-800-277-5300) between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET) or fax (1-703-243-7177). Or email us at orders@nsta.org. Download an eBooks+ Student Edition order form.
Pricing information is available per e-book/student/year. For any other questions regarding NSTA’s eBooks+ Student Editions, please contact ebooks@nsta.org.
Follow NSTA
In our earlier posts, we shared the many topics available and how teachers are using the student editions. In this post, we’ll share how to order the student editions and how students, teachers, and administrators can access and use the e-books.
By Korei Martin
Posted on 2017-04-03
This is an interesting and challenging time to be a science, engineering and/or STEM educator. Time, funding, support….all play into a complicated dance of priorities and resources. This is EXACTLY why the collaboration that happens at events like #NSTA is important to our students, teachers, administrators and the community at large. My biggest takeaway from NSTA is the collaboration it inspires is absolutely critical to increasing the scientific, engineering and technological literacy of our nation.
The most striking aspect of NSTA17 for me this week was the absolute focus on and prioritization of collaboration, among all of us. As I listened to teachers present classroom lessons, or exhibitors promote their products, or agencies and non-profits share a dizzying array of excellent resources, I in turn watched educators of all varieties engage, question, learn and share. One of my favorite sessions was one on Engineering and Literacy featuring PictureStem, a National Science Foundation funded project led by Dr. Tamara Moore of Purdue and Dr. Kristina Tank of Iowa State University. Tamara presented a series of lessons for early elementary grades that combined literacy through the use of common trade fiction and non-fiction books with age appropriate engineering activities utilizing the science, math, ELA and social studies aspects of those books. The 70ish teachers at the session eagerly participated in the hands on activities, asking questions and adding suggestions as they went. At the end, Tamara showed them where they could download the no-cost curricula. In this room, with these educators, policy issues, funding challenges, class size concerns and everything else simply faded as they all collaborated to learn new and effective engineering activities to take to their students.
Later, I took part in an engineering themed session aimed at K-3 called “Farm to Kitchen”. Two educators from the San Diego area shared the work they’ve collaborated on to help their young students understand “What is our place on the planet and where do the resources we use come from?” The question is what drew me to the session—after all we are talking about young children and that’s a BIG question. Their enthusiasm was contagious, my team fun and the projects well designed. And when I left, I was confident that these results of their collaboration would now be implemented and improved upon and positively impact many more children.
Teachers are in the trenches—it’s not uncommon that the whole day can go by without time even to do more than give cursory attention to personal needs. Collaboration is something “everyone knows” is good, but honestly the time to do it is rare. That’s why conferences like NSTA are so critically important. It’s a time to learn, share, get ideas, network and yes, to collaborate. NSTA supporting me to blog at this conference exemplifies the spirit of collaboration so critical to our nation. As an engineering educator, I look forward to finding more ways to work with my science education colleagues and experts. If you have ideas and are interested in collaborating, please contact me at Elizabeth.parry.consulting@gmail.com or @STEMninjaneer.
Author Liz Parry is a guest blogger for NSTA for the 2017 National Conference; follow Liz on Twitter @STEMninjaneer.
More About the 2017 National Conference on Science Education
Browse the program preview, or check out more sessions and other events with the LA Session Browser/Personal Scheduler. Follow all our conference tweets using #NSTA17, and if you tweet, please feel free to tag us @NSTA so we see it!
The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.
Future NSTA Conferences
2017 STEM Forum & Expo
Kissimmee/Orlando, July 12–14
2017 Area Conferences
Baltimore, October 5–7
Milwaukee, November 9–11
New Orleans, Nov. 30–Dec. 2
This is an interesting and challenging time to be a science, engineering and/or STEM educator. Time, funding, support….all play into a complicated dance of priorities and resources. This is EXACTLY why the collaboration that happens at events like #NSTA is important to our students, teachers, administrators and the community at large. My biggest takeaway from NSTA is the collaboration it inspires is absolutely critical to increasing the scientific, engineering and technological literacy of our nation.
By Debra Shapiro
Posted on 2017-04-02
At Brookwood School in Manchester, Massachusetts, Rich Lehrer, the school’s innovation coordinator, discusses the phalanges of prosthetic hands. Photo by David Oxton
Rich Lehrer, innovation coordinator at the Brookwood School in Manchester, Massachusetts, wanted his eighth graders to work on real-life science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) projects that help solve community problems. So in 2013, when he saw a video about South African carpenter Richard Van As and American mechanical special effects artist Ivan Owen creating a 3D-printed prosthetic hand to replace the fingers Van As lost in an accident, Lehrer says he was “blown away by [the opportunity] to create a prosthetic hand for Max,” his son, who was born with symbrachydactyly, a condition that causes short or missing fingers. “It was an opportunity to involve my students in an authentic project-based learning (PBL) and design project,” he maintains.
With advice from Van As, who, with Owen, posted the design for their Robohand online, Lehrer worked with 12 students over seven months in a weekly half-hour club to build the hand.
In Houston, Texas, Nghia Le, physical science teacher at Booker T. Washington High School, says he was interested in 3D printing because “I wanted to have my engineering students do rapid prototyping.” He discovered e-NABLE, a worldwide nonprofit community of volunteers who create free 3D-printed hands and arms for those in need. e-NABLE offers open-source designs on its website (see http://enablingthefuture.org) and matches persons needing the prosthetics with schools and organizations that can do the 3D printing.
In his classes, Le explains, “We focus on problem solving. Engineering [involves looking] at different problems, [seeing] how to apply innovative tools to everyday life and problems. Get[ting] students to apply what they know to solve a complex problem.” He says he wanted his students to help someone nearby so they could meet with the person.
“I let students choose projects, projects near us,” he adds. Through e-NABLE, Le and his students connected with six-year-old Gracie Henderson, who was born missing part of her left arm and hand. He and his students decided to create a prosthetic hand for her. “We weren’t sure we could do it, but we wanted to try,” he relates. “Problems are part of what we deal with, making sure students learn from their mistakes. [This project was] a perfect way for this to happen.”
Lehrer’s first hurdle was acquiring supplies. “We had three groups: one to find a 3D printer, one to find the metal hardware, and one to find thermoplastic, which gets soft when heated and can wrap around the arm and provide a form for holding everything together,” he explains.
“We connected with the Governor’s Academy in Byfield, Massachusetts, [to print] the parts. Our maintenance department helped with the metal components,” says Lehrer. A hand surgeon from Boston Children’s Hospital connected them with pediatric orthotic products supplier Boston Brace, which donated hundreds of dollars’ worth of thermoplastic material. But “figuring it out without a curriculum was hard. We looked at a lot of devices online,” he admits.
As a father, Lehrer faced the challenge of “doing the project with Max, considering his safety. So many things could have gone wrong” if the device had not been made well, he allows. He also had to consider his students’ safety. “We’re an independent school, so we followed departmental safety procedures. Heating the thermoplastic was a major issue, so we used tongs, hot plates, goggles, gloves, [and other safety equipment].”
Le obtained about $1,200 to purchase a 3D printer through a sponsorship by KBR Inc., a Houston engineering firm. “They support education and had an interest in our school’s program,” he notes. “[But we] went through two or three printers during the project,” with a second one donated through Donors Choose.org and a third “sold to us at a discount by a retail store,” he recalls.
“When the printer goes down, you have to send it to the shop,” which often involves waiting “six to nine months for the repair. We decided to learn how to fix a printer. We could fix 80% of the problems,” Le reports.
Another challenge with the printer is that “some parts of the hand…come out differently from what you expect,” he observes. And Le’s team had to start over after they created the first hand. “We first made a three-finger hand for Gracie, but she wanted five fingers,” he explains.
The project took about a year and a half. “We had a change of teams three times because students graduated. The last team took six months to complete the hand,” Le says.
Lehrer was excited when Max was able to use the finished hand, noting, “[I]t launched Brookwood and me into the world of authentic uses of 3D printing.” It also led to him becoming K–12 education coordinator for the e-NABLE Educators’ Exchange and the Enable Community Foundation, for which he wrote an official curriculum.
Lehrer says the prosthetic hands students are now creating are “95% 3D-printed (our first device was only 30% 3D-printed), and almost all parts can be 3D-printed in 16 to 20 hours…The 3D-printed upper limb prosthetics field has moved very quickly.”
The project “had a lot of impact on my students,” Le concludes. “They [developed] a personal relationship with Gracie, [which I believe is] important when training engineers and scientists …to help someone. Compassion is important.” His students are now trying to make a prosthetic foot for a duck.
One major factor in the success of Brookwood’s program has been that Max has been a student there for two years, Lehrer contends. “To do a good job of designing [prosthetics], you have to know the [user]…Most hand devices are designed and built by [persons without upper limb differences] who may not know what it’s like [for the users].”
As children grow, they outgrow devices, and many prosthetic hand users benefit from additional adaptors for various activities, he notes. “A sixth grader designed the clip that holds a drumstick so Max can play the drums. Other student-designed clips help him use a baseball bat and a scooter.”
Brookwood now has “kids building hands in fifth and eighth grade,…students designing activity-specific clips for adaptors for…Max’s hand, and has pioneered this very cool activity [in which] kids ‘hack’ the existing e-NABLE files to create cool little grabbers,” Lehrer reports. And to broaden the authentic design work students are doing, he has created a “problem bank” of “problems around the school and community that students can solve” using 3D printing, he relates. For example, students are working with senior citizens to create devices to help them.
These projects “are as rich, if not more rich, than making a 3D-printed hand…Real-life problems that need solving are the best use of the machines” because they help students develop problem-solving, 3D modeling, and technological skills, he contends.
As part of an engineering unit, Sue Gore’s fifth graders at Liberty Intermediate School in Chesterton, Indiana, build prosthetic hands. “There’s a section on biotechnology in our textbook that covers prosthetics of all kinds. I teach the design process for science and do a Rube Goldberg/simple machines project with my students, then lead them into biotechnology,” she relates. She and three colleagues who teach science and math decided to have students create prosthetic hands when they teach the biotechnology section.
The students use a variety of everyday materials, such as plastic fasteners, string, and cardboard, to create the hands. “The hand has to have a hinged wrist and jointed fingers and has to be anatomically correct,” says Gore. “It has to be acceptable to a human being; [with] no ‘claws.’”
Last year, students built their hands at home with parents or other adults. This year, students made them in the school’s new makerspace, paid for by a grant from the Duneland Education Foundation, which provides funds to enhance educational experiences for K–12 students in the community. “The students worked in teams to make their hands in the new makerspace,” Gore explains. In addition, “we knew that the students would be doing the hands-on work versus the parents doing most of it.”
The finished hands varied in size. “Some were…too large to hold a ball, a marker, or a cup,” which was required, Gore observes. “We critiqued [the hands] as engineers, so they would learn from their prototype….
“My students understand that you may redesign and tweak [a device] many times before it’s ready for the market,” she points out. “It’s important for students to collaborate and go through the whole cycle of the design process.
After attending a U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) conference for educators, Gore now teaches students about “getting their work protected. I…require them to do a diagram [of their prosthetic], just as engineers do when they submit inventions to [the USPTO],” she reports.
The unit ends with students “using the Human to Human Interface”—a device that connects one person to another with wires and uses probes—“to see how one’s brain can control another’s hand,” says Gore. “This was a great follow-up to the prosthetic hand presentations. The students were amazed that one could control [the] bodily movements of another [using] wires.”
She also emphasizes the human side of prosthetics. “We look at videos of the Special Olympics…[to see how] flexible materials are needed so an athlete can continue to compete. [We also consider the circumstances of] the Boston Marathoners and the difference you can make” in people’s lives with prosthetics.
This article originally appeared in the April 2017 issue of NSTA Reports, the member newspaper of the National Science Teachers Association. Each month, NSTA members receive NSTA Reports, featuring news on science education, the association, and more. Not a member? Learn how NSTA can help you become the best science teacher you can be.
The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.
Follow NSTA
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
At Brookwood School in Manchester, Massachusetts, Rich Lehrer, the school’s innovation coordinator, discusses the phalanges of prosthetic hands. Photo by David Oxton
By Peggy Ashbrook
Posted on 2017-04-01
Guest blogger Cindy Hoisington is a Senior Curriculum/Instructional Design Associate with Education Development Center. Hoisington believes that authentic, cognitively challenging science experiences can be transformative for young children. She brings to her work more than 20 years of experience teaching young children, developing educational materials, and instructing and mentoring early childhood teachers in language, literacy, and science education. Welcome Cindy!
I was thrilled to have the opportunity to present at the Early Childhood STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) Institute in Reno Nevada this week , an event sponsored by the Region 9 Head Start Association (covering the states of Arizona, California, Nevada, and Hawaii). This is Region 9’s sixth annual STEM institute and the theme was “Children as Inventors.” As a former Head Start (HS) teacher myself, it was wonderful to spend time with HS educators who fully appreciate the central role of exploration and play in children’s learning, an understanding that is fundamental to implementing rich, extended, and well-facilitated STEM experiences in classrooms. I presented on the topic of “Science and Language: A Natural Fit” and shared some of the work currently being done at Education Development Center Inc. (EDC) in Waltham MA. In our current project, Literacy and Academic Success for English Learners through Science (LASErS) , we build on a long stream of Early Childhood science work at EDC, and work with pre-K, K, and Grade 1 teachers in Hartford Connecticut to maximize science as a context for language and literacy development for ALL children. At my presentation, participants excitedly investigated mealworms (beetle larvae) and reflected on how this collaborative exploration promoted science thinking, language use, and the integration of challenging vocabulary. We viewed two videotaped science talks about ramps in preschool classroom to observe high quality teacher facilitation in action. Participants noted the tremendous respect the videotaped teachers had for children’s thinking and ideas about living things in one video, and about balls on ramps in another.
Cindy Hoisington leading a hands-on exploration of mealworm body structure.
Workshop participate Jill Uhlenburg observing mealworm motion.
At this Institute I also had the opportunity to participate on a panel discussion on the topic of “the future of math and science in early education” with STEM experts from WestEd, the University of Nevada, and Pacific Clinics Head Start. The discussion centered on challenges teachers face in facilitating STEM experiences along with potential solutions including: how to find time and space for doing their own inquiry-based investigations; how to integrate STEM and literacy goals; and how to maintain play at the center of children’s STEM experiences. These are universal issues that are important to early childhood teachers. Teachers at NSTA conferences express the same concerns.
A highpoint of the Institute for me was listening to the opening keynote by president-elect of NSTA, David Crowther, who is also a professor of science education at the University of Nevada, Reno. He emphasized NSTA’s increasing focus on STEM in the early years and the need for our youngest learners to have access to high-quality STEM experiences that promote inquiry-based investigation and scientific thinking. As a co-facilitator of the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) Early Childhood Science Interest Forum (ECSIF), I was particularly excited to hear him mention the Position Statement on Early Childhood Science Education adopted by NSTA and endorsed by NAEYC. He also emphasized how collaboration between NAEYC and NSTA can benefit early childhood science educators, a priority that the ECSIF has been promoting for several years.
Worm project, from the class of HS teacher Liana Guloyan, Pacific Clinics Head Start/Early Head Start.
Of course another highpoint of the event was the opportunity to meet and talk with STEM colleagues and educators from around the country. These conversations ranged far and wide and included: developing criteria to help teachers choose evaluate the educational quality of STEM materials and resources; using digital tools to promote children’s story-telling; and looking for the common threads across the STEM disciplines (direct experiences and opportunities for exploring, thinking, and talking) that can help teachers move forward in the STEM teaching.
I wrapped up my time at the institute with a visit to the science and math curriculum fair presented by teachers at Pacific Clinics Head Start/Early Head Start, located in Pasadena, CA called a “Celebration of Teachers Teaching Teachers.” The fair highlighted visually and intellectually stimulating documentation describing a variety of STEM projects (worms, wind, building, butterflies) in photos, drawings, and children’s words.
Guest blogger Cindy Hoisington is a Senior Curriculum/Instructional Design Associate with Education Development Center. Hoisington believes that authentic, cognitively challenging science experiences can be transformative for young children.
By Guest Blogger
Posted on 2017-04-01
The thing is, if you aren’t looking to broaden your knowledge and improve your practice, then stay away from the LA Convention Center and NSTA’s 2017 National Conference. I mean—stay away. Because when you walk into any door you are surrounded by a plethora of sessions, resources and exhibits. Oh, and did I mention the food trucks? Now that’s FULL service, NSTA!
Yesterday, I went to a variety of sessions that involved engineering in some way. One of my favorites—and one where I learned a lot—was led by Dr. Cary Sneider, a STEM expert and a lead on the development of the Framework for K-12 Science Education and the NGSS. The session was about Misconceptions about Engineering in the NGSS. In full disclosure, I consider(ed) myself somewhat of an expert on especially the engineering included in the NGSS. I led a review for ASEE (the American Society for Engineering Education) and have been using the standards in the bulk of my work as a P12 engineering education expert. So I’m not going to lie when I say I felt well, comfortable, about this session…maybe even a little smug.
Yeah, well that usually doesn’t work out the way. And it didn’t. Cary designed the session to have the audience members collaborate to complete some multiple-choice questions about engineering in the NGSS. He warned us that all the possible answers were at least somewhat right, and that we were to discuss them and choose what we thought was the best answer. Then we compared our results with another group, and finally, Cary reviewed the questions—and our answers—as a large group.
I was teamed up with a teacher from Mountain View, CA named Megan. Together we learned our first lesson: these seemingly clear statements had fuzzy answers. Yes, multiple choices could fit as an answer, or this part of (a) and that part of (c) were it. Megan and I discussed each one, and finally made choices. So when we compared our answers with the other team, color us surprised when the case they made for a different answer made sense. ARGH! Take it to the next level in the whole group discussion and clearly, much of the audience had struggled with the squishiness (yes, that’s a technical term). It was actually a bit disconcerting, as I know began to question myself.
Discoveries and Solutions Improve with Diverse Thinking
Near the end, Cary asked a brave lone dissenter why he’d chosen an answer. It was, after all, obvious he was wrong…..right? His reasoning, however, struck a chord. And all of a sudden, my perspective broadened. You could see from his face that Cary had the same reaction, and noted he’d simply never thought about it that way. He modeled, in exactly the right way, how to truly consider a different view and see it for the possibilities it presented.
Here’s the thing….in today’s education system being “right” is prized above all else, especially on tests in ELA and Math. As do scientists, engineers rely on data and evidence and as much as possible, try to minimize “squishiness.” But discoveries and solutions improve with diverse thinking. One of my favorite statements is a broader perspective on a solution team brings better solutions. Diversity, in all ways, matters. But perspectives tend to get fixed when answers are “right” or “wrong” , or when things “have always been that way” or when the way you’ve decided “it” is turns out to well, maybe not be just that way. It’s a little perplexing to have your perspective shift. But if you allow yourself to put that aside for just a moment it’s also invigorating, and squishy. And when you do all of this, and then model for others that it’s okay for the “expert” to still be learning—well, that’s perfect.
Author Liz Parry is a guest blogger for NSTA for the 2017 National Conference; follow Liz on Twitter @STEMninjaneer.
More About the 2017 National Conference on Science Education
Browse the program preview, or check out more sessions and other events with the LA Session Browser/Personal Scheduler. Follow all our conference tweets using #NSTA17, and if you tweet, please feel free to tag us @NSTA so we see it!
The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.
Future NSTA Conferences
2017 STEM Forum & Expo
Kissimmee/Orlando, July 12–14
2017 Area Conferences
Baltimore, October 5–7
Milwaukee, November 9–11
New Orleans, Nov. 30–Dec. 2
Follow NSTA
By Kate Falk
Posted on 2017-03-31
This week in education news, climate change skeptic group seeks to influence 200,000 teachers; some California schools are trading the blacktop for greentop; New Mexico schools continue to teach outdated science while new standards sit on the shelf; engineering is getting more attention in classrooms; and President Trump leaves science jobs vacant, troubling critics.
Climate Change Skeptic Group Seeks to Influence 200,000 Teachers
Twenty-five thousand science teachers opened their mailboxes this month and found a package from the Heartland Institute, a libertarian think tank that rejects the scientific consensus on climate change. It contained the organization’s book “Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming,” as well as a DVD rejecting the human role in climate change and arguing instead that rising temperatures have been caused primarily by natural phenomena. Click here to read the article featured on PBS.org.
Some Schools Trading The Blacktop For Greentop As An Innovative Way To Teach Science
Some students in California don’t have to take field trips to parks or national forests for environmental education – they just open their classroom door. To supplement their science and environmental curricula, hundreds of schools across the state have busted up their asphalt play yards and replaced them with wood chips, trees, flowers, shrubs and vegetables. The new gardens help teachers implement California’s new science standards, which emphasize hands-on learning, and crossover between scientific disciplines. Click here to read the article featured in EdSource.
What Would Trump’s Proposed Cut To Teacher Funding Mean For Schools?
President Trump has proposed getting rid of the Title II program, which aims to help districts and states pay for teacher and principal development, reduce class-size, craft new evaluation systems, and more. The program, which is officially called the Supporting Effective Instruction State Grant program, or Title II, Part A, is the third largest in the U.S. Department of Education’s budget that goes to K-12 education. Eliminating it would be a really big deal, state, district, and school officials say. Click here to read the article featured in Education Week.
The Irony In Ivanka Trump’s And Betsy DeVos’s Push For STEM Education
On Tuesday, presidential daughter Ivanka Trump and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos visited the National Air and Space Museum in Washington to “highlight the importance of science, technology, engineering and mathematics education” and to discuss “empowering young women to pursue STEM-related careers.” The event came just a short time after President Trump advanced his first federal budget, which included wiping out NASA’s education office, which oversees efforts to support women and underrepresented minorities in STEM fields, operates camps and enrichment programs, and provides internships and scholarships for young scientists. Click here to read the article featured in The Washington Post.
For four years, New Mexico Education Secretary Hanna Skandera has had on her desk a unanimous recommendation from a hand-picked panel of math and science experts. They want the state to join a growing list of others that have adopted the nationally vetted Next Generation Science Standards. It’s been two years since Skandera convened a focus group of 85 teachers, professors and school administrators to review new standards. That group also recommended NGSS adoption. Click here to read the article featured in the Santa Fe Reporter.
Engineering Making Headway In Schools, Analysis Shows
Engineering is getting more attention in classrooms, especially in those states that have adopted the Next Generation Science Standards, according to an analysis of national test data. Click here to read the article featured in Education Week.
Trump Leaves Science Jobs Vacant, Troubling Critics
On the fourth floor of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, the staff of the White House chief technology officer has been virtually deleted, down from 24 members before the election to, by Friday, only one. Mr. Trump has not yet named his top advisers on technology or science, and so far, has made just one hire. It is unclear whether the vacancies are the result of the Trump administration’s overall slowness in hiring or a signal that the president places less importance on science and technology than Mr. Obama did. Click here to read the article featured in The New York Times.
Stay tuned for next week’s top education news stories.
The Communication, Legislative & Public Affairs (CLPA) team strives to keep NSTA members, teachers, science education leaders, and the general public informed about NSTA programs, products, and services and key science education issues and legislation. In the association’s role as the national voice for science education, its CLPA team actively promotes NSTA’s positions on science education issues and communicates key NSTA messages to essential audiences.
The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.
Follow NSTA
This week in education news, climate change skeptic group seeks to influence 200,000 teachers; some California schools are trading the blacktop for greentop; New Mexico schools continue to teach outdated science while new standards sit on the shelf; engineering is getting more attention in classrooms; and President Trump leaves science jobs vacant, troubling critics.